How much news coverage is Arctic Security receiving right now?

As of October 2, 2026, coverage matching this topic makes up 0.001% of all articles GDELT monitors worldwide, roughly 4 articles per day.

Is media coverage of Arctic Security increasing or decreasing?

Coverage is down 93.0% week-over-week (the mean of the latest 7 days compared with the 7 days before).

What is the tone of news coverage about Arctic Security?

The average GDELT tone of matching coverage is -1.50, which reads as mildly negative. Tone typically ranges from about -10 (very negative) to +10 (very positive).

How are these numbers measured?

Geotone processes the GDELT Project's 15-minute data files every three hours, matching this topic's fixed query against article titles across 65+ languages and aggregating counts and tone by UTC day. Coverage volume is the share of all GDELT-monitored articles matching the topic query; tone is the mean document tone. Full details are on the methodology page.

Arctic Security

Arctic Security accounts for 0.001% of all global news coverage monitored by GDELT as of October 2, 2026 (4 matched articles/day). Coverage is down 93.0% week-over-week. The average tone of this coverage is -1.50 — mildly negative.

Coverage of military posture, shipping routes, and great-power competition in the Arctic.

Data updated: October 2, 2026 · refreshed every 3 hours from GDELT

Coverage share

0.001%

of monitored articles

Articles / day

matched by GDELT

Week over week

-93.0%

7-day mean vs prior

Average tone

-1.50

mildly negative

Coverage volume, last 90 days

Coverage tone, last 90 days

Emotional signature

Anxiety-related words per 1,000 words of matching English-language coverage (LIWC dictionaries via GDELT's GCAM). Latest day: 5.5 anxiety · 6.1 anger · 27.4 positive emotion. Tone says whether coverage reads negative; these say what kind of negative.

Where this coverage comes from

By language

English100.0%

Share of matching coverage, from GDELT breakdowns (as of 2026-10-02). Tone split: 25% of articles read distinctly negative, 0% distinctly positive.

In focus by country

Countries where Arctic Security coverage concentrates — each links to the stories and headlines for that intersection.

Related fact-checks

“We paid for, in my opinion, 100% of NATO because they weren’t paying their bills.”
FalseFactCheck.org · 2026-01-22

Via the Google Fact Check Tools API; ratings are the fact-checkers' own.

Frequently asked questions

How much news coverage is Arctic Security receiving right now?: As of October 2, 2026, coverage matching this topic makes up 0.001% of all articles GDELT monitors worldwide, roughly 4 articles per day.
Is media coverage of Arctic Security increasing or decreasing?: Coverage is down 93.0% week-over-week (the mean of the latest 7 days compared with the 7 days before).
What is the tone of news coverage about Arctic Security?: The average GDELT tone of matching coverage is -1.50, which reads as mildly negative. Tone typically ranges from about -10 (very negative) to +10 (very positive).
How are these numbers measured?: Geotone processes the GDELT Project's 15-minute data files every three hours, matching this topic's fixed query against article titles across 65+ languages and aggregating counts and tone by UTC day. Coverage volume is the share of all GDELT-monitored articles matching the topic query; tone is the mean document tone. Full details are on the methodology page.

Methodology: coverage share and tone are computed from GDELT's 15-minute data files and aggregated to UTC days — see how every number is computed. Derived data is CC BY 4.0 (“Geotone / GDELT”).