GlobalSecurity.org
Wikipedia classification
Wikipedia's editor community classifies this source as generally unreliable for sourcing purposes.
From Wikipedia's perennial sources list (CC BY-SA). This is Wikipedia editors' consensus about citing the source in articles — not Geotone's judgment, and not a general truth rating.
Ownership
Wikidata records no current owner for GlobalSecurity.org — it may be independent, or the record may be incomplete.
Ownership from Wikidata (CC0), current claims only. Where records lack end dates, the recorded owner may lag reality.
Coverage mix
Most-covered tracked topics
Counts articles matching Geotone's tracked topics only — a coverage-mix sample, not total output.
Measured tone & selection profile
Coverage selection vs the global mix
- Taiwan Strait11.6× the all-outlets share
- Ukraine War3.2× the all-outlets share
- Sanctions2.3× the all-outlets share
Share of this outlet's topic-tagged articles per topic, divided by the same share across all observed outlets. n = 653, trailing 90 days; topics with thin global samples excluded.
Tone vs topic average, most-covered topics
- NATO+3.22 (n=120)
- Iran War & Succession+1.51 (n=86)
- Taiwan Strait+0.69 (n=79)
- Ukraine War-2.38 (n=63)
- Terrorism-0.57 (n=61)
Outlet's mean headline tone on the topic minus the topic's all-outlets mean, same window — coarser than the story-consensus figure but topic-resolved.
These are measured quantities with disclosed formulas — not a bias or reliability rating. Tone is computed from headlines only (article text is never stored), measures framing relative to co-covering outlets rather than factual accuracy, and consensus clusters cover the English-language stream only. See methodology.